A few months ago, a good news came from Chinese academic circles. Han Chunyu, an associate professor at Hebei University of Science and Technology, invented a new method of gene editing, which is much better than the mainstream CRISPR Cas gene editing technology. This can be called explosive. news. If humans thoroughly master the gene editing technology and use it in clinical practice, many diseases including cancer can be cured. Therefore, the significance of this research need not be said, and countries attach great importance to it. In 2013, Zhang Feng, a Chinese scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), made a breakthrough in the acquisition of CRISPR Cas, and was listed as the top of the top ten scientific and technological advancements by Nature. A few months ago, Michael Sipser, Dean of the MIT School of Science, introduced the achievements of MIT to Silicon Valley. He only introduced two achievements, one of which was the work of Zhang Feng (the other was the experiment that confirmed the gravitational wave not long ago). The importance of genetic editing research. In 2015, the Life Science Award in the Breakthrough Award was awarded to two female scientists working in CRISPR, Jennifer of the United States? Dudner and Emmanuel of France? Carpenter can also see the attention of this research worldwide. Therefore, if the outcome of Han Chunyu is true, even if the Nobel Prize cannot be won soon, it is still certain that at least the breakthrough award will be won. However, it is always necessary to attract the wind. Han Chunyu's technology is much better than the world's leading CRISPR Cas technology. Scientists from all over the world flocked to try to repeat Han Chunyu's experiment. But so far, I don't know if Han Chunyu's paper was unclear, or the verifier's experimental conditions were not correct. In short, no one has been able to repeat the results of Han Chunyu, so some people questioned Professor Han's fraud. There is no fraud in falsification. This is not the problem I am going to talk about today. People in this academic circle will find out. I want to talk about academic rules through this incident, especially the rules of the scientific community. Han Chunyu, Associate Professor, Hebei University of Science and Technology What is science? To talk about academic rules, you must first understand what science is. Many people in China have always equated science with correctness. In fact, the most important thing in science is the method, not the conclusion. Science just opposes always correct. I passed this chapter in the "Science Era" chapter of "The Light of Civilization" Many examples have been elaborated. Human beings' understanding of the world and its laws is not static, but is constantly improving. It begins to think that the correct conclusions may later find limitations. Therefore, the scientific conclusion is nothing more than the conclusion or hypothesis of the experimental results (or our observations and cognition) obtained through scientific methods in the current cognitive situation. Any scientific conclusion must be able to be proved and falsified, especially if it must be falsified. Conclusions that cannot be substantiated and falsified, such as "God is alive," are religious beliefs that do not fall within the realm of science. Therefore, the conclusion of science cannot be the slogan of religion. It is not universally applicable. It cannot be said that everyone believes in it, and science does not obey politics. Compared with scientific conclusions, the scientific method is much more important. Only by adopting scientific methods, the achievements made are recognized by the academic circles, and the academic rules. Since science focuses on methods rather than conclusions, and anyone who engages in scientific research must follow these methods, scientific research is actually a very sad career: when you propose a new method, or get a predecessor When you don't know the conclusion, you are actually declaring to the academic circles all over the world, "Now you can confirm or falsify my conclusion, you can deny me and point out my shortcomings." If a scientist is not holding this The mentality is to study, but to rely on the size of the sound (and the number of fans) to maintain their correctness, then he is not a scientist in the true sense, at most it is a schoolmaster who suppresses his peers.
1. Fat content: 30%-65%
2. Protein content: 5%-12%
3. Package: 1kg/bag
4. Shelf life: 24months
5. Applications:
Aerated products for industry and household:
Cream-imitations
Decoration foams
Aerated desserts and cake fillings as powder or fresh
topping base,whipping cream powder,snow topping,whipped cream powder KARAK , https://www.jskarak.com![[Viewpoint] What kind of academic rules are derived from the academic debate of Han Chunyu?](http://i.bosscdn.com/blog/20/16/08/05024006937.jpg)